<HTML><PRE>Subj:	Fwd: Phila Inq 1/13 - Appeasement Partition Assembly Blueprint Released
Date:	98-01-13 20:42:25 EST
From:	Buni1957
To:	DeeMcA, RedAxe66, Love irela, Connemara7
To:	FenianBoyo, JustaLocal
CC:	sean@cafes.net, haavar75@hotmail.com
CC:	nl1135@launet.baynet.de


-----------------
Forwarded Message: 
Subj:	 Phila Inq 1/13 - Appeasement Partition Assembly Blueprint Released
Date:	98-01-13 19:49:18 EST
From:	redhand@fast.net (Edmond J. O'Neill)
Sender:	owner-ireland_list@email.rutgers.edu
To:	ireland_list@email.rutgers.edu ('ireland list')

Blueprint for Northern Ireland peace talks is released
By Fawn Vrazo
INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

LONDON -- The British and Irish governments released yesterday the blueprint of 
a final agreement on Northern Ireland peace negotiations. It called, among 
other things, for the Republic of Ireland to revise its hallowed and 60-year 
constitutional claim to the six British-controlled counties on the island's 
north side.
Officials for both governments cautioned that the proposal was not solid but 
represented only "our best guess at what could be a generally acceptable 
outcome."
But the proposal nonetheless was expected to help break the logjam at Northern 
Ireland peace negotiations, which resumed yesterday after a holiday break.
The negotiations have been proceeding haltingly for 18 months with the two main 
negotiators -- mainstream Protestant unionists and Sinn Fein, the political 
wing of the IRA -- as yet to talk to each other directly.
The proposal's release was prompted by a newspaper leak. Over the weekend, 
London's Daily Telegraph printed details of a London-Dublin agreement text, 
prompting the two governments to release their own version of the proposed 
agreement yesterday.
According to the Telegraph, the Irish government still had fundamental 
disagreements with the British government.
The Irish, according to the paper, wanted an agreement that would lead the way 
to a united Ireland while the British sought a compromise that would lead only 
to power-sharing government bodies between the Republic and the island's six 
northern counties, which have been under British control since the Ireland 
partitioning agreement of 1921.
The British-Irish blueprint agreement released yesterday said only that the two 
governments would "not have a problem" agreeing to "changes" in Articles 2 and 
3 of the Irish Constitution. Those articles stake the republic's claim to 
Northern Ireland by stating that the national territory "consists of the whole 
of Ireland, its islands and the territorial seas."
Presumably, a final agreement would call for the Republic of Ireland to 
renounce that claim on the north.
At the same time, said the proposal released by both governments, Dublin and 
London could readily agree to a north-south ministerial council that would work 
jointly on issues equally relevant to both north and south -- such as tourism 
and agriculture.
More significantly, the proposal called for a Northern Ireland Assembly that 
would be elected by a system of "proportional representation," giving weighted 
representation to Northern Ireland's 60 percent Protestant and 40 percent 
Catholic population.
A previous Northern Ireland assembly was dissolved in the early 1970s after a 
bitter civil rights uprising by Catholics who said all Northern Ireland 
government bodies were tipped unfairly toward Protestant control.
None of the proposals in the blueprint released yesterday is new. They have 
been considered and proposed openly since the Anglo-Irish Agreement and a peace 
negotiation framework agreement of the mid-'90s.
But the proposals represent the first significant and concrete blueprint for 
current peace negotiators in Belfast, who began their current round of talks in 
June 1996, to work on.
Yesterday, as the blueprint was released, it received cautious approval from 
the Ulster Unionist Party, the main party representing Northern Ireland's 
Protestants, as well as the Social Democratic and Labor Party, representing 
mainstream nationalists who believe in Ireland's future unification but only if 
that can be achieved peacefully and democratically.
Sinn Fein, the political wing of the IRA and voice for hard-line nationalists 
who want British control in the province to end immediately, withheld immediate 
reaction.

<FONT  COLOR="#0f0f0f" BACK="#fffffe" SIZE=3>

----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
Return-Path: <owner-ireland_list@email.rutgers.edu>
Received: from  relay06.mail.aol.com (relay06.mail.aol.com [172.31.109.6]) by air21.mail.aol.com (v37.8) with SMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 1998 19:49:18 -0500
Received: from smithers.rutgers.edu (smithers.rutgers.edu [165.230.4.69])
	  by relay06.mail.aol.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
	  with SMTP id TAA06311 for <buni1957@aol.com>;
	  Tue, 13 Jan 1998 19:47:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 25997 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 1998 00:46:12 -0000
Delivered-To: ireland_list-og@email.rutgers.edu
Received: (qmail 25971 invoked by uid 6539); 14 Jan 1998 00:46:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 25867 invoked from network); 14 Jan 1998 00:45:56 -0000
Received: from post1.fast.net (198.69.204.13)
  by smithers.rutgers.edu with SMTP; 14 Jan 1998 00:45:56 -0000
Received: from redhand.fast.net (x2-01-038.phl.FAST.NET [205.147.239.38])
	by post1.fast.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA24176
	for <ireland_list@email.rutgers.edu>; Tue, 13 Jan 1998 19:46:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 13 Jan 1998 19:44:36 -0500
Message-ID: <01BD205B.AD861400.redhand@fast.net>
From: "Edmond J. O'Neill" <redhand@fast.net>
To: "'ireland list'" <ireland_list@email.rutgers.edu>
Subject: Phila Inq 1/13 - Appeasement Partition Assembly Blueprint Released
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 19:42:43 -0500
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="---- =_NextPart_000_01BD205B.AE696F20"
Sender: owner-ireland_list@email.rutgers.edu
Precedence: bulk

</PRE></HTML>
